Warren Appears to Brush off Sanders’ Attempt for Post-Debate Handshake

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) appeared to rebuff Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) during an end of debate exchange on Tuesday night.

The moment came after days of rising tension between the longtime friends who are now progressive rivals in the Democratic primary. It appeared that Sanders approached Warren for a handshake, which she did not accept, and then after a brief exchange, Sanders turned away and left the conversation.

That exchange was the latest in a series of stories that have left people wondering about how the two candidates are getting along.

Over the weekend, Politico reported that Sanders volunteers were framing Warren as a candidate for the elite in door-to-door campaigning by telling voters “people who support her are highly-educated, more affluent people who are going to show up and vote Democratic no matter what.” Then it ran a story claiming that “Sanders surges as progressives flock to him over Warren.”

On Monday, CNN dropped an anonymously sourced report, during a private conversation in 2018, where Sanders had apparently told Warren a woman couldn’t win the election. Sanders denied the report, calling it “ludicrous.”

But Warren’s team let it run without commenting for the entire day. And then, later that night, Warren released a statement confirming the report.

Inevitably, the question about this story was going to come up at the debate. When it did, Sanders once again flatly denied it.

This was the exchange between debate moderator Abby Phillip and Sanders:

PHILLIP: “Let’s now turn to — let’s now turn to an issue that’s come up in the last 48 hours. Sen. Sanders, CNN reported yesterday that — and Sen. Sanders, Sen. Warren confirmed in a statement, that in 2018 you told her that you did not believe that a woman could win the election. Why did you say that?”

SANDERS: “Well, as a matter of fact, I didn’t say it. And I don’t want to waste a whole lot of time on this, because this is what Donald Trump and maybe some of the media want. Anybody knows me knows that it’s incomprehensible that I would think that a woman cannot be president of the United States.”

Then Phillip turned to Warren and asked her a similar question.

PHILLIP: “Sen. Warren, what did you think when Sen. Sanders told you a woman could not win the election?”

WARREN: “I disagreed. Bernie is my friend, and I am not here to try to fight with Bernie. But, look, this question about whether or not a woman can be president has been raised, and it’s time for us to attack it head-on. And I think the best way to talk about who can win is by looking at people’s winning record. So, can a woman beat Donald Trump? Look at the men on this stage. Collectively, they have lost 10 elections. The only people on this stage who have won every single election that they’ve been in are the women…”

When the debate moderators moved on, it appeared this story might go away. But the exchange at the end of the night set speculation on fire once again that the two were experiencing some serious tension.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump stepped into the fracas, throwing his support behind Sanders during a rally in Wisconsin.

“I don’t believe that Bernie said that. I really don’t. It’s not the kind of a thing he would say,” Trump said, before adding that he did not like Sanders.


  1. Dear Genital,

    You’re “beloved leader” just got stabbed in the back by Warren and now the MSM.
    It’s 2016 all over again.

    Socialist dreams die hard.

  2. “Kavanaugh was not guilty there was no proof” Cherrie

    As far as getting judicial appointments approved, proof of guilt is not necessary for the Senate just to error on the side of caution.

  3. I skipped the “white on rice” analogy, but surely others can step up with comparisons.

  4. The Dim candidates are whiter than the phone bank for a PBS fundraiser.

  5. Has anyone else noticed that the Dim candidates are whiter than marshmallows in a snowstorm?

    Good thing the Left loves it some diversity.

  6. Has anyone else noticed that the Dim debates are whiter and wealthier than the NHL?

    1. Do you mean like the American Fascist Party? When was the last time that THEY had a candidate of color run for president? Oh, right, sleepy Ben Carson. And how did that work out?

  7. Liawatha missed the chance to bury- the tomahawk, err, hatchet. Joe would be loving this if he weren’t prepping for the Nebraska, err, Iowa primaries.

    On one hand you have a candidate who’s a pathological liar–from her ethnicity, to her kids’ schooling, to quitting a job, to paying for her Medicare for All scheme.

    On the other hand Bernie’s previous campaign was rife with accusations of sexual harassment which were ignored because he was busy. He also authored those bizarre gang-rape/torture pieces.

    We KNEW the Dim candidates would eventually have a “Night of the Long Knives” coming. There can be only one to lose to Trump in 2020.

    1. “Bernie’s previous campaign was rife with accusations of sexual harassment which were ignored because he was busy.” I Ching

      BS Whatever happened was not done by Bernie and it was dealt with appropriately. It was NOT rife. Only in the minds of the corrupt media and his detractors, just as it is happening again with these new accusations.

      1. You’re “beloved leader” just got stabbed in the back by Warren and now the MSM.
        It’s 2016 all over again.

        Socialist dreams die hard.

  8. The fun keeps on happening. For even more fun, tune into The Colbert Report every night.

  9. I am relatively certain Bernie did not say a woman could not be president EVER but he may have said he did not think it would happen in 2020.

    Remember folks semantics is a game politicians (most of them) excel at.

  10. Trump has a history of selectively believing denials despite all evidence to the contrary. —-He believed Putin over ALL U.S. Intel agencies and decided to announce it on the world stage. He believed Kim Jung Un was going to denuclearize and went so far as to claim his hand picked directors of FBI, CIA, and NI were “taken out of context” when they testified before Congress that there was NO EVIDENCE NK had intentions of denuclearizing. He believed MBS denials of Khashoggi’s killing. He believed Roger Ailes and Bill O’Reilly. He believed Roy Moore over his accusers. He believed Kavanaugh over accusations he SAID were “credible.” He believed Duncan Hunter and Chris Collins and they both ended up pleading guilty. There can be several reasons for his voicing belief of absurd denials. But one does have to wonder if he is setting the stage for Trumpers to follow his lead and not fear looking as foolish when they claim to believe Trump’s many absurd denials.

  11. These 2 repulsive creatures wish to be President and there are plenty of lowlife scumbags that want that to happen.

Comments are closed.